Chiseling Away at Oppression
The Economic Vision of America’s Founding Fathers
The economic system of the United States reflects an intricate interplay between capitalist principles and communist governance, resulting in a hybrid model that pits the elite minority of private capital owners against the elite minority in government.
Our founding fathers did not articulate this as capitalism vs. communism; their system blended free-market economics with governmental oversight.
The dynamic tension has created the precarious balance that defines the American system.This balance emerged as a way to:
- Protect individual freedoms rooted in capitalist ideals of private ownership and economic liberty.
- Prevent tyranny and unchecked power requiring a strong, centralized government as a counterweight
Capitalism: The Engine of Economic Development
From the outset, the U.S. prioritized private property and individual enterprise:
- Private Ownership: The founding fathers enshrined the right to own property as a cornerstone of liberty, ensuring that individuals could accumulate wealth through production, trade, and innovation.
- Market Competition: A free market was seen as the best way to drive economic growth and individual prosperity.
- Limited Regulation: Initially, the government maintained a laissez-faire approach to business, allowing capital owners to flourish with minimal interference.
The Capitalist Elite:
- Wealthy landowners, industrialists, and merchants became the first elite minority, controlling production and capital.
Their wealth and influence enabled them to shape policies, often to protect their own interests.
Government’s Essential Role in Economic Management
To address the temptations of human nature that occur with the concentration of wealth and power in private hands, the founding fathers created a representative government tasked with managing public resources and promoting public welfare:
- Checks and Balances: The U.S. Constitution established a system where government power was distributed among branches, ensuring no single entity could dominate.
- Taxation and Public Services: The government was empowered to collect taxes and fund public resources like infrastructure, education, and defense, reflecting a proto-communistic approach.
- Regulation: Over time, government oversight expanded to address market failures and protect workers, consumers, and the environment.
The Government Elite:
- Elected and appointed officials, bureaucrats, and judges formed another elite minority, wielding significant control over resource distribution and societal planning.
The Convergence of Capitalism and Communism
Over time, the balance of power between private capital and public governance in the United States has eroded, allowing financial influences to infiltrate government and align the interests of two elite groups: the capitalist minority and the governmental minority.
1. Financial Power: Shaping Political Landscapes
This convergence has created a system where the majority—the working and middle classes—are systematically disenfranchised and exploited for the benefit of the elite few.
- Campaign Financing and Political Dependency
The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision in 2010 allowed unlimited private influence in political campaigns, equating financial contributions with free speech. As a result, politicians have become increasingly reliant on funding from corporations, wealthy individuals, and special interest groups.
- Lobbying as a Tool of Influence
Private interests invest billions annually in lobbying to craft laws and regulations that serve their agendas. A “revolving door” exists between government and private sectors, where former officials take lucrative lobbying roles, perpetuating cycles of influence and favoritism.
- Privatization and Deregulation
Public services like education, healthcare, and infrastructure have been increasingly subjected to private influence, transforming essential services into profit-driven industries. Deregulation, often framed as promoting efficiency, allows corporations to operate with minimal accountability, prioritizing profits over public welfare.
2. The Alignment of Minorty Interests
This dependency ensures that policy-makers prioritize the interests of those wielding influence over the needs of their constituents.
- Shared Economic Goals
The capitalist elite and governmental elite share a vested interest in maintaining a system that preserves their wealth and authority.
Corporate-State Symbiosis: Governments rely on private capital for tax revenue and economic stability, while private influencers depend on favorable policies and subsidies to maximize profits.
Tax Policies: Wealthy private influencers push for tax cuts and loopholes that disproportionately benefit them, shifting the financial burden onto the working majority.
- Mutual Power Consolidation
Private influence drives governments to weaken labor protections, deregulate industries, and suppress worker power.
Governments protect private interests through subsidies, bailouts, and contracts, often at the expense of public investment.
- Suppression of Labor Force
Policies that undermine unions and collective bargaining benefit both elites by keeping labor costs low and workers divided.
Government trade policies exploit cheaper labor abroad while leaving domestic workers vulnerable.
3. The Exploitation of the Working Class
Oppression does not have to be intentional to have negative effects on our society. The apathy of the minoity class is just as harmful as malicious exploitation.
- Economic Inequality
Worker productivity has increased dramatically, but the profits of that labor are disproportionately captured by those wielding private influence.
Wealth concentrates in fewer hands, while the majority face rising costs and limited economic mobility.
- Burden of Debt
The privatization of essential services has created long-term financial dependence on entities influenced by private interest.
Predatory lending practices ensure that cycles of debt persist, benefiting private influencers at the expense of the majority.
- Erosion of Public Services
Public funding is deprioritized in favor of policies that cater to private interests.
Working Class Communities face deteriorating services while privatized alternatives profit from their absence.
- Political Disenfranchisement
Private interests ensures that policies serve the powerful rather than the majority.
Systemic barriers serve to silence the voices of working-class citizens.
4. Mechanisms of Systemic Inequality in Society
The infiltration of private influence into government has allowed the interests of the capitalist elite and the governmental elite to align and create a system that prioritizes profits and power over the needs of the majority.
- Media Control and Narrative Framing
Media organizations shape public opinion to protect elite agendas while obscuring systemic exploitation.
Divisive narratives distract the majority from uniting against shared economic and political oppression.
- Consumer Dependency
Overwork and consumer debt keep individuals focused on survival, leaving little time or energy to challenge systemic inequalities.
A culture of individualism shifts blame onto individuals rather than addressing the structural causes of inequality.
- Elite Collaboration
Capitalist and governmental elites reinforce each other’s power, private influencers fund political campaigns, while governments enact laws and policies that protect their benefactors.
This alignment transforms the government into an enabler of exploitation instead of a counterbalance to private interests.